AI IELTS Writing AI Correction
- Discussion
The government should impose a fee on drivers who use their vehicles during rush hour to help cut down on air pollution from exhaust fumes. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
스코어팩토리 AI가 에세이를 평가하였습니다.
Evaluation
Task Response: 8
The student effectively addresses the topic, clearly outlining their viewpoint, providing examples to underline their argument and include the broader implications of the topic.
Coherence & Cohesion: 8
The ideas are logically organized and the progression of thought is clear to the reader. The student uses a variety of cohesive devices and paragraphing effectively, which ensures the essay is easy to understand.
Lexical Resource: 9
The student has used a wide range of vocabulary effectively and accurately. Rarer words such as 'catalyst' and 'degradation' are used appropriately, and the vocabulary is sophisticated but still fits the context of the essay.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy: 9
The essay shows a versatile use of complex structures with full flexibility. There's a high degree of grammatical control with virtually no errors.
Overall: 8.5
This essay effectively addresses the task, is well-structured, and shows a broad range of sophisticated language and accurate grammar. Minor improvements could further refine the essay, but it's excellent overall.
Task Response: 8
The student effectively addresses the topic, clearly outlining their viewpoint, providing examples to underline their argument and include the broader implications of the topic.
Coherence & Cohesion: 8
The ideas are logically organized and the progression of thought is clear to the reader. The student uses a variety of cohesive devices and paragraphing effectively, which ensures the essay is easy to understand.
Lexical Resource: 9
The student has used a wide range of vocabulary effectively and accurately. Rarer words such as 'catalyst' and 'degradation' are used appropriately, and the vocabulary is sophisticated but still fits the context of the essay.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy: 9
The essay shows a versatile use of complex structures with full flexibility. There's a high degree of grammatical control with virtually no errors.
Overall: 8.5
This essay effectively addresses the task, is well-structured, and shows a broad range of sophisticated language and accurate grammar. Minor improvements could further refine the essay, but it's excellent overall.
스코어팩토리 AI가 작성한 모범답안입니다.
The government should impose a fee on drivers who use their vehicles during rush hour to help cut down on air pollution from exhaust fumes. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Essay:
In relation to imposing a rush hour fee on drivers to mitigate air pollution levels, there is a significant division of opinion. I, however, am strongly in favor for it because of the substantial benefits to our environment and society.
Firstly, imposing a rush hour fee could incentivize motorists to either carpool or rely on public transport alternatives as a way to circumvent these extra charges. This idea, if executed, could result in less congested roads and a substantial reduction in harmful emissions. In support of this, we can look at London, where the introduction of a congestion charge had a positive impact on traffic and air quality.
Secondly, the finances generated from this fee could provide substantial funding for environmental projects. For example, by allocating these funds appropriately, governments could invest in green initiatives that help to further decrease pollution levels. A salient example of this can be found in Stockholm, where they have utilized revenues from a similar scheme to enhance the city’s green spaces, which in turn has positively impacted the air quality.
In summary, implementing a rush hour fee could serve a dual purpose - it could decrease traffic congestion while promoting environmental sustainability through the funding of green initiatives. This proposal, therefore, is not only important but, in my opinion, quite essential.
Word count: 214
Essay translated in Korean:
화물차 운전자에게 러시아워 요금을 부과하는 것은 대기 오염 수준을 완화하는 관점에서 상당히 의견이 분분하다. 그러나 나는 환경과 사회에 미치는 상당한 혜택으로 인해 이것을 강력히 지지한다.
첫째로, 러시아워 요금을 부과하면 운전자들이 이런 추가 요금을 피하기 위해 카풀을 하거나 대중교통을 이용하는 것을 고려하게 될 수 있다. 이 아이디어를 실행하면 도로의 혼잡도가 줄어들고 유해한 배출물이 크게 줄어들 수 있다. 이를 지지하는 사례로, 런던에서 혼잡요금을 도입하면서 교통과 공기 질이 긍정적으로 변화된 사례를 들 수 있다.
둘째로, 이 요금에서 발생하는 재정은 환경 프로젝트를 위한 상당한 자금을 제공할 수 있다. 예를 들어, 이 자금을 적절히 배치함으로써, 정부는 오염 수준을 더욱 줄일 수 있는 녹색 이니셔티브에 투자할 수 있다. 이에 대한 대표적인 예는 스톡홀름에서 비슷한 계획의 수익을 활용하여 도시의 녹색 공간을 향상시키는 데 사용했고, 이는 공기 질에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤다.
요약하면, 러시아워 요금을 시행하는 것은 교통 혼잡도를 줄이는 데서만 정지하지 않고, 녹색 이니셔티브를 통한 환경 지속 가능성을 촉진하게 해준다. 따라서 이 제안은 중요할 뿐만 아니라 꽤 필수적이라고 볼 수 있다.
Good expressions:
1. mitigate air pollution levels - 대기오염 수준을 완화하다
2. substantial benefits - 상당한 혜택
3. rely on public transport alternatives - 대중교통 대체수단을 이용하다
4. allocate these funds appropriately - 이 자금을 적절히 배분하다
5. green initiatives - 녹색 이니셔티브
6. environmental sustainability - 환경 지속 가능성
7. quite essential - 꽤 필수적이다.
In relation to imposing a rush hour fee on drivers to mitigate air pollution levels, there is a significant division of opinion. I, however, am strongly in favor for it because of the substantial benefits to our environment and society.
Firstly, imposing a rush hour fee could incentivize motorists to either carpool or rely on public transport alternatives as a way to circumvent these extra charges. This idea, if executed, could result in less congested roads and a substantial reduction in harmful emissions. In support of this, we can look at London, where the introduction of a congestion charge had a positive impact on traffic and air quality.
Secondly, the finances generated from this fee could provide substantial funding for environmental projects. For example, by allocating these funds appropriately, governments could invest in green initiatives that help to further decrease pollution levels. A salient example of this can be found in Stockholm, where they have utilized revenues from a similar scheme to enhance the city’s green spaces, which in turn has positively impacted the air quality.
In summary, implementing a rush hour fee could serve a dual purpose - it could decrease traffic congestion while promoting environmental sustainability through the funding of green initiatives. This proposal, therefore, is not only important but, in my opinion, quite essential.
Word count: 214
Essay translated in Korean:
화물차 운전자에게 러시아워 요금을 부과하는 것은 대기 오염 수준을 완화하는 관점에서 상당히 의견이 분분하다. 그러나 나는 환경과 사회에 미치는 상당한 혜택으로 인해 이것을 강력히 지지한다.
첫째로, 러시아워 요금을 부과하면 운전자들이 이런 추가 요금을 피하기 위해 카풀을 하거나 대중교통을 이용하는 것을 고려하게 될 수 있다. 이 아이디어를 실행하면 도로의 혼잡도가 줄어들고 유해한 배출물이 크게 줄어들 수 있다. 이를 지지하는 사례로, 런던에서 혼잡요금을 도입하면서 교통과 공기 질이 긍정적으로 변화된 사례를 들 수 있다.
둘째로, 이 요금에서 발생하는 재정은 환경 프로젝트를 위한 상당한 자금을 제공할 수 있다. 예를 들어, 이 자금을 적절히 배치함으로써, 정부는 오염 수준을 더욱 줄일 수 있는 녹색 이니셔티브에 투자할 수 있다. 이에 대한 대표적인 예는 스톡홀름에서 비슷한 계획의 수익을 활용하여 도시의 녹색 공간을 향상시키는 데 사용했고, 이는 공기 질에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤다.
요약하면, 러시아워 요금을 시행하는 것은 교통 혼잡도를 줄이는 데서만 정지하지 않고, 녹색 이니셔티브를 통한 환경 지속 가능성을 촉진하게 해준다. 따라서 이 제안은 중요할 뿐만 아니라 꽤 필수적이라고 볼 수 있다.
Good expressions:
1. mitigate air pollution levels - 대기오염 수준을 완화하다
2. substantial benefits - 상당한 혜택
3. rely on public transport alternatives - 대중교통 대체수단을 이용하다
4. allocate these funds appropriately - 이 자금을 적절히 배분하다
5. green initiatives - 녹색 이니셔티브
6. environmental sustainability - 환경 지속 가능성
7. quite essential - 꽤 필수적이다.
제출한 라이팅
Many folks argue against the imposition of a fee on drivers who use their vehicles during rush hour, despite the significant contribution this traffic makes to air pollution. However, in my viewpoint, such a charge could turn out a constructive step in lessening congestion and combating environment degradation.
Firstly, the introduction of a rush hour fee could act as a catalyst in reducing the heavy traffic we witness during peak hours, consequently lessening harmful emissions into the air. Charging drivers may prompt them to consider alternatives such as carpooling or utilizing public transport. For instance, London saw significant positive changes after implementing a similar approach. The congestion charge they introduced encouraged people to abandon their cars for other means of transportation, resulting in less traffic and dwindling pollution levels.
Moreover, the income from the rush hour charges could be further invested in ecological enhancements. Such funds can help governments to take steps towards making their cites greener. Stockholm provides a fitting example, where the revenues from similar charges have been used to plant trees and flowers across the city, not only adding to the beauty but also significantly improving air quality.
In conclusion, by implementing a fee on peak-hour drivers, we can alleviate traffic issues and employ the collected funds for environmental preservation. Hence, in my view, this policy is worth considering for the welfare of our planet and society.
Firstly, the introduction of a rush hour fee could act as a catalyst in reducing the heavy traffic we witness during peak hours, consequently lessening harmful emissions into the air. Charging drivers may prompt them to consider alternatives such as carpooling or utilizing public transport. For instance, London saw significant positive changes after implementing a similar approach. The congestion charge they introduced encouraged people to abandon their cars for other means of transportation, resulting in less traffic and dwindling pollution levels.
Moreover, the income from the rush hour charges could be further invested in ecological enhancements. Such funds can help governments to take steps towards making their cites greener. Stockholm provides a fitting example, where the revenues from similar charges have been used to plant trees and flowers across the city, not only adding to the beauty but also significantly improving air quality.
In conclusion, by implementing a fee on peak-hour drivers, we can alleviate traffic issues and employ the collected funds for environmental preservation. Hence, in my view, this policy is worth considering for the welfare of our planet and society.
공유
返回列表 😎
